The Right and Wrong Ways to Add a NOT NULL Constraint

I tested these examples in an Oracle 11.2 database. The first one shows how to add a NOT NULL constraint retrospectively. You start by creating a table:

SQL> create table andrew (col1 varchar2(1))
  2  /

Table created.

SQL>

Then at some point in the future, you add a NOT NULL constraint like this: 

SQL> alter table andrew modify (col1 not null)
  2  /

Table altered.

SQL>

Doing it this way, the constraint is obvious when you describe the table:

SQL> desc andrew
Name                       Null?    Type
-------------------------- -------- ------------------
COL1                       NOT NULL VARCHAR2(1)

SQL>

… and, if you try to add a null value, the error message is self-explanatory:

SQL> insert into andrew values (null)
  2  /
insert into andrew values (null)
                           *
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ("ORACLE"."ANDREW"."COL1")

SQL>

The second example, which I saw recently, shows how NOT to do it. You start, as before, by creating a table:

SQL> create table fred (col1 varchar2(1))
  2  /

Table created.

SQL>

… then you add a CHECK constraint as follows:

SQL> alter table fred
  2  add constraint con1
  3  check (col1 is not null)
  4  /

Table altered.

SQL>

You cannot see this constraint when you describe the table:

SQL> desc fred
Name                       Null?    Type
-------------------------- -------- ------------------
COL1                                VARCHAR2(1)

SQL>

… and when you try to add a null value, the error message is not very helpful:

SQL> insert into fred values (null)
  2  /
insert into fred values (null)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02290: check constraint (ORACLE.CON1) violated

SQL>